Posts Tagged ‘defense spending’
Recent Posts
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 |
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
Blogroll
Books
Sites
austerity
Bailout
Barack Obama
Ben Bernanke
budget
budget deficit
budget surplus
Business News
capital
current account
CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICIT
debt
deflation
Depression
economic collapse
economic policy
Economy
fascism
Fascist State
Federal Reserve
fictitious money
Finance
financial crisis
Frederick Engels
gold
great depression
Greece
Historical Materialism
human costs of empire
inflation
international financial system
John McCain
Karl Marx
Keynesian economics
Labor theory of value
leon keyserling
libertarianism
Lord John Maynard Keynes
Marx
Marxism
monetary policy
money
National Secuirty
National Security Council
National Security Council Memorandum
NSC-68
obama
Paul Krugman
political-economy
politics
Politics News
recession
Robert Kurz
shorter work time
shorter work week
soviet union
stupid economist tricks
Stupid progressive tricks
stupid Washington tricks
surplus value
Tax Cuts
Tax Policy
The Economy
The State
trade
TRADE DEFICIT
trade surplus
Trickle Down Economics
Truman
unemployment
Wall Street
Wall Street Crisis
war
war on iraq
Wikileaks
U.S. war spending jumps 21 percent since the beginning of the crisis…
(Click to enlarge)
This is a helpful graph, which crystallizes what is actually taking place amidst all the numbers being thrown around today. We have yet to see anything like it elsewhere.
One under-reported aspect of the GDP numbers released last week is the impact US war preparations spending is having on inflating that measure of economic activity.
Under-reported is a kind way of putting it; the actual term should be “A fucking cone of silence.”
Since this crisis began to blossom in 2007, much of the collapse has been hidden by a marked ramp up in war prep expenditures – first, by the Moron, and now by the Messiah.
This, in addition to corporate subsidies – in the form of Cash for Clunkers, and tax breaks for new home-buyers – accounts for most, if not all, of the bounce in GDP witnessed in the doctored numbers.
If, as CNBC‘s Jim Cramer informed us, and Klaus Kleinfeld, President & CEO of Alcoa confirmed, the first leg of an attempt to find a way out of this crisis is to accelerate a shift of industrial operations from the U.S. to faster growing markets like Brazil, Russia, and China, the second leg is clearly an attempt to improve profitability in the United States by increasing expenditures on those kinds of goods which have no productive use – things anyone who is not insane would consider wasteful.
War preparation, thus, serve a two-fold purpose: First, they allow Washington to fulfill its role as buyer of last resort, and second, they allow profits to be expanded in a way that it does not further increase productive capacity.
What the second point means, in plain English, is that wasteful spending like war preparations makes the US appear less productive than it really is.
Of course, the question posed by that last statement is: Why the fuck would Washington want the US economy to appear less productive than it really is?
The answer is that this has nothing to do with Washington. This is a blindly thrashing attempt to slow unemployment and over-production (the accumulation of superfluous workers, inventories of unsold goods and excess money that cannot be invested profitably.)
If work can be expanded in an area which is not productive – building machines designed to kill people – people, goods and money can be redirected from productive purposes – which only add to unemployment and over-production – into an economic dead end for the time being.
There is, of course, a connection between the Cramer observation, and the rise in war spending:
Since military spending adds nothing to the real living standard of Americans, the net result is that even as Brazil and China become more productive due to investment by Alcoa and other American companies, real wages in the United States become more like those in Brazil and China.
In the words of Tom Friedman, the world gets flatter.
But, of course, we have seen all of this before, haven’t we? It was called the Rust Belt – when manufacturing left the industrial states to move to the Sunbelt, Mexico, and other venues to lower labor costs resulting in the longest period of stagnant wages in US history.